• Users Online: 116
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 311-313

Color difference on simple visual reaction time in young volunteers


Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission26-Oct-2014
Date of Decision20-Nov-2014
Date of Acceptance28-Nov-2014
Date of Web Publication21-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Anupama Batra
Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur - 302 004, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2348-8093.149771

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Simple reaction time is used to evaluate the processing speed and the co-ordination between the sensory and motor systems. Reaction time is influenced by various factors. Therefore, the effect of color stimulus in modulating the reaction time among young Indian males has been investigated in this study. A total of 50 healthy volunteers (young males) of age group 18-28 years were included in the study. The subjects were presented with two visual stimuli viz.; red and green light by using an audio visual reaction time apparatus. Using paired t-test for comparison of visual reaction time between red and green color in young males, it was observed that the response latency for red color was significantly less compared to green color (P < 0.05). From the present study, it could be suggested that the color stimulus has an impact in modulating the visual reaction time.

Keywords: Color of the stimulus, Indian population, visual reaction time


How to cite this article:
Batra A, Vyas S, Jeph D. Color difference on simple visual reaction time in young volunteers. Int J Clin Exp Physiol 2014;1:311-3

How to cite this URL:
Batra A, Vyas S, Jeph D. Color difference on simple visual reaction time in young volunteers. Int J Clin Exp Physiol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jan 21];1:311-3. Available from: http://www.ijcep.org/text.asp?2014/1/4/311/149771


  Introduction Top


Reaction time is a reliable indicator of the speed of processing of sensory stimulus and its execution in the form of motor response by central nervous system (CNS). [1] Reaction time has been defined as the time interval between the application of a stimulus and the response by the subject. [2] It is an indirect index of the processing ability of CNS and simple means of determining sensory motor association and performance of an individual. [3] Reaction time can be used to detect the level of arousal of CNS, to determine sensorimotor performances, [4] to measure the speed of decision making and response selection [5] and also for assessing the aspects of the planning and execution of voluntary movements. [6]

Visual reaction time (VRT) is a physical skill closely related to human performance. It represents the level of neuro-muscular coordination in which the body, through different physical, chemical and mechanical processes decodes visual stimuli which travel via afferent pathways and reach the brain as sensory stimuli. [7],[8],[9],[10] Simple VRT can be determined when an individual is asked to press a button as soon as a light appears. [11] Study done by Thompson et al., has documented that the mean reaction time to detect the visual stimuli is approximately 180-200 ms. [12]

Various factors affect VRT such as stimulus, age, gender and fatigue. Further it has been reported that visual reaction time with red color elicits a faster response when compared to green. [13] On contrary other study shows, reaction time for green color was shorter. [14] In view of conflicting reports about the VRT in response to red and green, in this study the effect of VRT with respect to green and red light stimuli was assessed.


  Materials and methods Top


The present study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, after obtaining the ethical clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee. 50 young healthy male volunteers of age group (18-28 years) were recruited from SMS Medical College, Jaipur. All the subjects included in the study were healthy, nonalcoholic, nonsmoking and had clinically normal vision. Informed consent was taken from all the subjects. Reaction time experiment was done in the morning, between 10 a.m. to 12 noon. After noting the relevant history and thorough clinical examination each participant was explained about the study protocol and sufficient trials were given for proper understanding. After demonstrating the procedure, subjects were asked to respond to visual stimuli by pressing the response key with the index finger of their dominant hand and three consecutive readings of stimulus were recorded, using an audio VRT apparatus (Medisystems Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Maharastra). The interval between the stimuli was randomly varied from 2 to 5 s. The time taken by the trainer is called as VRT. The least reading of three was taken as the value for VRT.

Statistical analysis of data

Data were expressed as mean±SD. Results from the comparison of VRT between green and red color were analyzed by using Student's paired t-test. SPSS version 13 (SPSS Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis of data and a P > 0.05 was considered significant.


  Results Top


Average values of simple VRT in males are 0.194 ± 0.085 s for red colour and 0.256 ± 0.135 s for green color [Table 1].
Table 1: Comparison of VRT for red colour versus green colour among young males


Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Reaction time is an important component of motor movements. It is one of the important methods to study a person's central information processing speed and the fast coordinated peripheral movement response. Reaction time is the interval between the onset of a stimulus and the commencement of a movement response. [15] Singer et al., defined reaction time as being composed of four stages, namely: The start of eye movements, eye movement time, decision time and muscle contraction time. [16] In the present study, as [Table 1] depicts, VRT for red color stimuli is significantly less compared with green color stimuli among young males aged 18-28 years. This can be explained on the basis of relative number of cones activated in response to a particular color of light on the basis of trichromatic theory of color vision, which shows that sensation of any given color depends on relative frequency of impulses being sent from each of the cone systems. It has been reported that when the retina was illuminated with microelectrode penetration of single cones, 16% of the units peak in blue spectrum, 10% in the green and 74% in the red. Thus, maximum number of cones are activated for red color, followed by blue and least response was for green color. [17] Our observations are consistent with the previous reports. [13],[18]


  Conclusion Top


The VRT for red color stimuli was significantly less compared to green color stimuli, which can be explained on the basis of trichromatic theory. Thus, from the present study it can be concluded that there is an impact of color of stimulus in modulating VRT.

 
  References Top

1.
Aley L, Miller EW, Bode S, Hall L, Markusic J, Nicholson M, et al. Effects of age, task complexity, and exercise on reaction time of women during ambulation tasks. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2007;30:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mohan M, Thombre DP, Das AK, Subramanian N, Chandrasekar S. Reaction time in clinical diabetes mellitus. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1984;28:311-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Das S, Gandhi A, Mondal S. Effect of premenstrual stress on audiovisual reaction time and audiogram. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1997;41:67-70.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Malathi A, Parulkar VG. Effect of yogasanas on the visual and auditory reaction time. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1989;33:110-2.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wurtman RJ. In : Choline, editor Adelman. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Vol. I. Boston: G. Birkhauser; 1987. p. 232-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Brown RG, Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD. Response choice in Parkinson's disease. The effects of uncertainty and stimulus-response compatibility. Brain 1993;116:869-85.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tripo RS. How fast can you react? Sci Dig 1965;57:50.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Luce RD. In: Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. Oxford Psychology Series 8. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 562.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Welford AT. In: Choice Reaction Time: Basic Concepts. Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press; 1980. p. 73-128.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Shelton J, Praveen KG. Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Neurosci Med 2010;1:30-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Pain MT, Hibbs A. Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time. J Sports Sci 2007;25:79-86.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Thompson PD, Colebatch JG, Brown P, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Obeso JA, et al. Voluntary stimulus-sensitive jerks and jumps mimicking myoclonus or pathological startle syndromes. Mov Disord 1992;7:257-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Shenvi D, Balasubramanian P. A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times in males and females. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1994;38:229-31.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Venkatesh D, Ramachandra DL, Baboo NS, Rajan BK. Impact of psychological stress, gender and colour on visual response latency. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2002;46:333-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Magill RA. Motor Learning Concepts and Applications. 5 th ed. Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 19.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Singer RN, Murphey M, Tennant LK. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. New York, USA: Macmillan Publishing; 1993. p. 54.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
West JB editor. Best and Taylor's Physiological Basis of Medical Practice. 11 th ed. Baltimore/London: Willium and Wilkins; 1986. p. 1065.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kalyanshetti SB. Effect of colour of object on simple visual reaction time. J Krishna Inst Med Sci Univ 2014;3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5037    
    Printed55    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded451    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]